Romantic Interlude

Holly here – I am totally hijacking the blog because Amanda is out of town for a few days.

- because she is at my house this weekend!

- because J & I are getting married tomorrow!

If I were a bit more together, I would put together a post about how spending evenings sitting in the family room while J (in his recliner) and I (on the couch, with a cup of tea) are both reading, is among my favorite things to do. However, I’m a little busy this week, so instead, I offer you photographic representation of our life in books: I am reading a book that Amanda demanded I read and Jeff is reading about the civil war. Typical evening (save the fancy dress and professional photographer).

20140511_Holly-Jeff-Engagement_049

Review: The Signature of All Things

Title: The Signature of All Things

Author: Elizabeth Gilbert

Published 2013 by Penguin

501 pages

Source: Library

signature of all things

Reviewed by Holly 

I can’t talk about this book without talking about my experience with Eat, Pray, Love – and that is this: I really loved Eat, Pray, Love. And then I read a whole bunch of negative comments on the book, complaining that Elizabeth Gilbert was narcissistic and spoiled and that it was incredibly unfair that she got to go on this sojourn around the world while processing her first world problems. Even my mom called her a whiner.

Whatevs – I dug it.

And then The Signature of All Things came out, and all I’ve heard about this book is great praise – which sort of left me wondering, would I have the opposite reaction as the critics this time, and hate this book? So, I picked this up (from the library, yo!) with some trepidation.

And – I loved it. I wanted to start recommending it to people before I was even done.

The Signature of All Things is set in the nineteenth century, in Philadelphia and (way) beyond.. It starts with the story of Henry Whittaker, who grew up poor in England and then rises to great fortune through a combination of hard work, moxy, and circumstance, and then turns to his daughter Alma, born in 1800. The story of the family runs alongside the story of nineteenth-century scientific progress, with a heavy dose of repressed desire throughout. The 500 pages ebb and flow, with times where a great deal of action happens in quick succession, followed by times where nothing seems to happen for years on end. It’s a long book – and drags on a bit at the end – but it did not take me long to finish.

In summary, highly flawed characters + weird and random adventures + interesting scientific details make for an enjoyable read. Throw in broader themes about abolition, colonialism, and what families are made of, and I found parts of this story sticking with me. And, if nothing else, you’ll learn Victorian slang for ladyparts, as well as some facts about plants.

Rating: 5 Stars

Parting Words:

Beatrix admired the useful over the vapid, the edifying over the entertaining. She was suspicious of anything one might call “an innocent amusement,” and quite detested anything foolish or vile. Foolish and vile things included: public houses; rouged women; election days (one could always expect mobs); the eating of ice cream; the visiting of ice cream houses; Anglicans (whom she felt to be Catholics in disguise, and whose religion, she submitted, stood at odds with both morality and common sense); tea (good Dutch women drank only coffee); people who drove their sleighs in wintertime without bells upon their horses (you couldn’t hear them coming up behind you!); inexpensive household help (a troublesome bargain); people who paid their servants in rum instead of money (thus contributing to public drunkenness); people who came up to you with their troubles but then refused to listen to sound advice; New Year’s Eve celebrations (the new year will arrive one way or another, regardless of all that bell-ringing); the aristocracy (nobility should be based upon conduct, not upon inheritance); and overpraised children (good behavior should be expected, not rewarded).

 

Top Ten Characters I would want with me on a deserted island

cafc6-toptentuesday

Today we’re hooking up with the Broke and the Bookish for their Top Ten Tuesday and here are my top ten characters I would want with me on a deserted island. 

1. Hermione Granger -Because she’s brilliant and of course magic.  She comes with 2 sidekicks of course who need no explanation

2. Harry Potter

3. Ron Weasley

4. Lula  of the Stephanie Plum Series.  Because she makes me laugh until I cry in almost every book.

5. Ranger also Stephanie Plum.  Because he’d get us out of any situation-also he’s just hot.

6. Miss Havisham-of the Thursday Next Series specifically.  Because if we need to get out she can always read something to get into the Book World.  Also, she’s hilarious.

7. Percy Jackson-definitely stole this from another TTT list at Book Revels because she made a really good point-if you’re stuck on an island you want the son of the sea god on your side!  

8. Celaena Sardothien from Throne of Glass.  I feel like having a female assassin on board can’t hurt anything.

9. Verity Price from Incryptid.  Who knows what kind of island this is-we may need a scientist.

10.  Elisa from the Girl of Fire and Thorns.  She’s got serious camping experience so I think she’d be good to have around!

 

Conclusion: Dorothy Must Die

Dorothy

Amanda: Wow.  So I think I can safely say Holly and I agree, Dorothy really has to go. She’s a megalomaniac in blue gingham and red heels.

I have to say I was starting to get irritated because I felt like the mission the cover of the book told me about wasn’t happening:

Remove the Tin Woodman’s heart

Steal the Scarecrow’s brain

Take the Lion’s courage

and then

Dorothy must die!

Happily my fears were unfounded! This book ended with a quite a kick and set the stage well for book #2.

Holly- Yes!  I had the same thoughts about the cover.

What I really liked is that no one is really completely trustworthy.  Amy has to be a smarty pants. Its going to boil down to Kansas girl vs. Kansas girl.  

Wizard, Order of the Wicked, monkeys, Pete.  Who to trust?!

In summary, this was a book that did not make me work very hard, but still had some heavy topics woven in about fear and power.  I wasn’t kidding about the Nazi references! And because it was such a clever and creative idea, and because I’m currently sending this text from Kansas I give it 5 stars!  I can’t wait for #2!

I completely loved this book for the creativity.  I think Paige was very brave to take this beloved story and basically turn it on its head.  I really liked Amy and even her pet rat.  I cannot wait to see what happens next and I think I’m going to brush up on my Baum reading to get ready.  I might even check out the novellas set in Paige’s Oz.  I have to go down a 1/2 star because of the romance.  It was not believable enough for me, but we’ll see what develops in Book #2!  I’m hoping for more munchkins! 

Head down the Yellow Brick Road and tell us what you think!

Holly 5 stars!

Amanda 4.5 stars!

Thank you Harper360 for these copies in exchange for an honest review!!

Review: Dear Daughter

18693753

Dear Daughter, Elizabeth Little

Amanda

Expected Publication July 31st 2014 by Viking Adult

384 pages, Hardcover

Source: NetGalley

Imagine for me if you will that a teenaged Paris Hilton killed her mother.  Imagine the fall out, the paparazzi and the E! news hysterics.  Then imagine after her conviction Paris is released from jail 10 years later on a technicality.  That is the basic premise behind Dear Daughter.  

Janie Jenkins went from tabloid darling to inmate.  She’s now hiding from the paparazzi and trying to re-acclimate to freedom after 10 years in jail.  Janie was not a nice character, but she was a fun one!  I loved her attitude and the situations her mouth got her into.  It wasn’t hard to see why people believed she was a murderer!  Janie really doesn’t think she is the one that killed her mother, but she’s not absolutely sure.  Going on snippets overheard before her last fight with her mother on the night of the murder Janie is out to investigate who her mother really was.  With the help of her attorney she changes her appearance and flees California.  

Jane ends up undercover in small-town South Dakota where she sticks her nose into everything and everyone’s business trying to find out why her mom would have mentioned this town.  She doesn’t necessarily make herself more likeable, but she was entertaining!  Jane’s story is interspersed with transcripts from her police interview, news articles and posts from a true crime blogger who has a price on her head.  I liked getting all the flashes back at the past drama Jane was involved in right along with her current snooping.  While I found that the motivation for the murder was easy to predict, the path we took the revelation was not what I thought it would be.

I was definitely on edge at the end of this book waiting for a reveal.  I had to get off the train with 4% left on my kindle and that nagged at me all day.  The wait was totally worth it.  The conclusion was more than I expected and the ending of this book made me really laugh out loud.  It was the perfect wrap up to Janie’s story.  I felt like Jane’s mom tried to steal the story from beyond the grave-but Janie wrenched right back for herself. I can see why this is being compared to Gone Girl, but I enjoyed it much more.  Janie was not always likeable, but you still want to root for her! 

This is Little’s debut book and I am definitely looking forward to more.  Read it and tell me what you think!

4 stars!

Thank you Viking and NetGalley for this advance copy in exchange for an honest review.

Dorothy Must Die 2/3 Through!

DmD

Second Third, Through Page 300

Holly

Amanda

Find our first thoughts here:

What do you think, sister? I think Danielle Paige has some serious imagination to come up with all this creepiness! Well, imagination and some serious Nazi references, right? I hate the Scarecrow (we should not post spoilery details, but ewwwwww. I have the creeps)

I’m slow, didn’t even think Nazis.  ICK.  That Lion scared the crap out of me. It took a lot of thought to make these beloved icons into such creepy and scary guys.   Dorothy too obviously, but taking those sweet and cuddly friends of hers and going to the other extreme is a really fun concept for the book.

Uh yeah, there is some serious Josef Mengele shit going on. And also Munchkin pogroms. At least that’s my interpretation. On another note, I thought it was hilarious that there was a command: “magic painting, show me [whatever]” Ha! That doesn’t sound like much of a spell!

Okay, and I have to say there is a bit of schizophrenia between referencing The Wizard of Oz the book versus the movie. Dorothy’s shoes are silver in one reference (book) and red (movie) when Amy makes it to the Emerald City. She talks about Glinda’s dress and refers to watching the movie on one page, and then the book 2 pages later! And the Tin Woodman’s origin story is definitely out of the book!

Seriously, I’m going to read wikipedia now.  I think you’re right.  And then aren’t they silver on the cover?

Honest to goodness though, as much as I clearly noticed the jumps in references, it makes total sense. I mean, you’d have to reference the movie because that’s what everyone knows! But, the book has more details and history to work with – like the creeper Tin Woodman story, the geography of Oz, and the ruling family’s line of descent. So, I don’t mind that Amy has knowledge of both and sort of thinks of them both interchangably. I mean, she does have a better knowledge of the book than arguably your average teen (or adult!) would have, but I suppose I can manage that suspension of disbelief amidst the rest of this story…

Hmm.  I’ll be honest, I tried Wikipedia just because I have a compulsive need to know details (this probably explains my compulsion to keep reading series that I’ve grown to despise…) but that was kind of frustrating.  I think I needed to read all about OZ-rather than just the first book but I don’t want to go too overboard.  Maybe I’ll plan to read the series while waiting for Book #2 in this series!

Anyway, I do like that Pagie’s Oz is a mixture of the movie and the book worlds.  Nearly everyone has to have seen the movie, but how many people have really read the original books?  She’d have to base as much as she could off the movie for familiarity, but also want to mine the details of Baum’s written world.  I love the thought that Paige put into the Revolutionary Order of the Wicked and how different they all are.  I really am going to have to read up to understand who is her creation and who is from the Oz series.

Time for me to get to reading! 

We’re Reading: Dorothy Must Die

Amanda and Holly read Dorothy Must Die by Danielle Paige (in three parts). Thank you to Harper360 for the sending copies for us to read together!

unnamed

Check out the book trailer if you want a quick overview – in short, Dorothy has gone bad, Oz is a mess, and another girl from Kansas takes a trip to Oz via tornado.

First Third, Through Page 155

Holly

Amanda

I think this book is hilariously creative.The Kansas cliches are one of the best parts – totally overdone, but I think that goes along with the irony of this whole story. I mean, we’ve got the trailer park, addict mom, disappeared dad, pregnant teenage bully, not to mention a town called Flat Hill, Kansas. (Note: not a real place.)

I agree, hilariously creative. And brave. I mean you’re messing with Dorothy and Glinda-Oz itself. Judy freaking Garland. This could have really upset people. I love fairy tale retellkngs (Kill Me Softly, Indexing) so this is perfect for me. I do wish I knew more about the Oz books besides Dorothy- maybe I’ll hit Wikipedia before reading the next 1/3…

So, I was listening to an interview with M.T. Anderson talking about how he wrote Feed(TBR pile!) in the future, because one of the hard things about writing contemporary stories, especially YA, is that cultural references become dated so quickly. So, while I loved that Paige threw in details like “one of those blankets with sleeves that Mom had ordered off TV with money we didn’t have,” I wonder how long that Snuggie reference will resonate with readers.

That’s funny.  I did giggle at the Snuggie reference, but you’re right.  Who knows how long we’ll remember those.

Also, um, were YA books always so violent? I honestly can’t remember if there was so much killing and fighting in the genre. Did it start with The Hunger Games? Before that? I mean, it’s downright formulaic:

 1. Hero/ine gets involved in some sort of organized fighting scene

2. Training. There’s always training.

3. Much blood and bruising

4. Someone fights someone to the death.

Examples? The Hunger Games, Divergent, His Fair Assassin. Hmm, I suppose even Harry Potter, because what’s Dumbledore’s Army besides an organized fighting training group. Is that where this started?

Isn’t adolescence in and of itself difficult enough without every story being about someone having to fight someone? Are all teenagers harboring latent violent tendencies these days, or what?

I don’t know that I think the violence is new, I mean you go back as far as Ender’s Game and you get the children being trained up for war.  I think its just HOT right now as a trend thanks to the HG, Divergent -and I could go on and one into dystopians.  I know! What we need is John Green to write a dystopian! That will blow minds.

Anyway, that said I am completely creeped out by the Tin Man and what I hear of the scarecrow.  I can’t wait to get back into Oz.  I’m not sure I want Amy to be an assassin yet.  I know Dorothy sounds like bad news, but to go from poor Kanas girl to killer?  I’m not sold.

Follow along as we continue the next 33.3% tomorrow!

PS-How cool is this cover?  I love it!